Something my son sent me: Example I just made(I think it's realistic): for example, "water" lamēne [lɑmeːne] old elf: lamēne > lomīna [lɑmeːne] > [lɒmeːne](rounding before m,b,exc shift) > [lɒmeːnɐ̟] > [lɔme̟ːnɐ] > [lɔmiːnɐ] > [lɔmïnɐ] old fairy: lamēne > lamīn [lɑmeːne] > [lɑmɛ̟ːnɛ] > [lɑmiːn] > [lɑ̟miːn] > [læmiːn] > [lɔ̟mɪ̟ːn] .middle-ish elf: [lɔmïːnɐ] > [lɔmɨːnɐ] > [lɔmɨːn̩] > [lɔm(ɐ)iːn] [lɔmɐjn] > [lɔmɐi̯n] > [loməi̯n] middle-ish fairy: [lɔ̟miːn] > [lɔmiːn] > [lɔm̝iːn] (intervolatic loss of contact) ~ [lɔβ̃iːn] modern-ishes forms: fairy: [læβ̃iːn]~[læb̃iːn] elf: [loməi̯n]~[lɔmɐi̯n]. idk, I made this for a ben and holly thing. no, it's not because they're industrial, /I:/ is just instable in elf.and in fairy, like American flapping, m/b turn into../β̃/ and /β/, though, in some elf m for /β/ can occur in elf, it triggers next to rounded stuff . Loan word “holly”: [hɔliː] > [hɔl(ə)i] > [holəi̯] > [hoɫəi̯] [hɔliː] > [hɔɫiː] > [hɔwiː] > [hɔw̞iː]~[hɔʋiː] in folklore, it's English. so, I thought, they picked up Latin orthography, so, here are some convergences, I gets a diacritic to differ itself, though, it's a slash, not a dot: ı̴(renders oddly, but it's fine), and later on, was confused for a. later /ɪ/ or /ɐi̯/, creating a split: ı̴ and ı. so, lamın)fairy( and elf, lomı̴na)(I've been doing this for like a year), Though,,,lomı̴na [loməi̯n] is shifting toward.. [loβ̃əi̯n] > [low̃əi̯n].. hmmm , I LOVE convergence.
hmm unrelated, but I WAS a señor, but now I'm a señora . The interesting thing is that it was an EME descendent but I actually never worked on the features of that, but, one thing I did from that period is that Armageddon didn't mean whatever it means now, but comes straight from the Bible "har mageddon"? and it meant more like husbanding before they left .If I wanted to refine it while being a little more special [ˌhæɹ.mæ.ˈɡɛd.ɔn] > [hæɹ.mɛ.ˈgɛd.ɒn] > [hɝ.mɛ.ˈgɛd.ʊn] > [hɚm.ɛ.gɛd.ən] > [hɚm.ə̯.gɛdn̩] > [hɚm.gɛdn̩] hermegedun,or more phonetically hermgedn ehen then you can tell Armageddon and Hermgedn are cognates .It means husbanding since they pried at a different part of the verse— " they assembled them at the place that in Hebrew is called Harmageddon.”—they pried at the Assembly part to mean to assemble there to protect? You can see how it got its modern meaning, I think that might've been the reason back then too but idk.You could say "dey Hermgedund" Hermgedund is an irregular form from Hermgedn + ed..I feel like [eɪ] could change to [eæ̯].So they would be [ðeæ̯].It's like Australian but a little less .So, basically , they would say before the move according to my old notes and new evolutions "to Harmageddon our English" which wasn't grammatically correct ar the time ? ?snort.[ˈɪŋɡlɪʃ]. [ˈɛŋglɛʃ] [æŋgəs̝] [ɑŋgs] [ɑŋsg] [ɑnsg] . [ɑnzg]So they dropped our, to make "to Hermegedun-angussh"..Ans modernly, to Hermgedn-Angzz.So I'm reconstructions it's called Hermgedn-Angzz to English linguists in universe because they confused Hermgedn-Angzz as a phrase .[ˈðɑʊ̯] [ðɔ] [dʊ] [.də].The -st endings either change to -t or remain the same.So itd look like "thou saiy't" as seen in theiy..If it were fully phonetica, it'd be dou say't, the -ouh/ou from -ough English that make the [ʊ] sound.Hmm.. Im keeping it. ˈɡlɪbliː] [ˈɡlɪbliː] [ˈglɛbiː] [glɛbi] [glæbi] [gleæ̯bi](a dipthong insertion to make it roll smoother off the tounge) [gleæ̯bɛ] [gleæ̯b] spelt gleib/gleiyb, it means Slippy/f.oolsome.It's like how some English dialects preserve EME terms like fret.Experiment: [bɔi̯] [bɔj] [bɐj] [bəj] [bə̯j]? Causal reduction of boy, because I think that'd be said a lot and it'd change isolated but [bɐj] is common between words.But there is a slight grammar mutation you can put -s on th and st.sayiths js pronounced like [seæ̯θ̞s].The lowered delta makes the th to s transition easier and smoother .Oh, also, the -s attached on st and th is to make it present tense in emphasis and in causal form
